John Chapter Two Commentary

Contents

I. Introduction. 1

II. John Chapter Two Commentary Verses. 1

2:1-11-Blood-Red Wine (Cana, Cross, Kingdom) 1

2:12-Headquarters Capernaum.. 1

2:13-25-One Cleansing of the Temple, Three Eye-Witness Accounts. 1

III. Illustrations and Tables. 1

Figure 1. Palestine. 1

Works Cited and References. 1

Notes. 1

 

 

I. Introduction

In the introductory chapter to this Gospel of John we were privileged to meet the Eternal Word; the Word become flesh (“John Chapter One Commentary”); even Jesus Christ who, as we learned, fast purposed to visit the Gentile badlands of Galilee to plant some seedlings in that spiritually dry, spiritually rough, spiritually unplowed ground, and to garner a following from some fishermen soon to become fishers of men. In this chapter we find Him laying the tip of His Plow ( His eternal Word that is) into that unplowed ground yonder in Galilee, quite purposing to turn it over, to turn it inside-out, to expose it, to the eternal Truth inherent in His Word, thus setting into motion the purposes of God for humankind, even Redemption unto Salvation. And in keeping with those purposes are we surprised that His first order of business concerns a credentials-verifying miracle that involves some blood-red wine at a marriage feast, not unlike some blood-red wine that involves also His last order of business and a fourth cup no less miraculously filled at a Marriage Supper (“The Fourth Cup”)? No, we are not surprised. The purposes of Jehovah God are from first to last consummated in the One who is the First and the Last, the Eternal Word. None other than this Consummate One is Able; able to satisfy the purposes of Jehovah God. Thus, we find Him embarking on a purposes-satisfying ministry in this chapter (“He Who Sent Me”).

 

We will follow this format:

 

Verse of Scripture utilizing the YLT text followed by an NASB mouse over of that verse. Key words in the YLT text will be footnoted with a link to a word study based on the Greek text, and/or a general discussion relative to the given word (we are not biblical Greek or Hebrew scholars, please consider our grammatical constructions with a critical eye).

 

Commentary We shall be commenting on this passage keeping before us at all times the crucial fact that every jot and every tittle comprising these verses came forth under the inspiration of the blessed Holy Spirit. We pray that He, by His grace, helps us along the way.

 

II. John Chapter Two Commentary Verses

2:1-11-Blood-Red Wine (Cana, Cross, Kingdom)

YLT TEXT: And the third[1] day a marriage[2] happened in Cana of Galilee[3], and the mother of Jesus was there, and also Jesus was called[4], and his disciples, to the marriage; and wine[5] having failed[6], the mother of Jesus saith unto him, 'Wine they have not;' Jesus saith to her, 'What -- to me and to thee, woman[7]? not yet is mine hour come.' His mother saith to the ministrants[8], 'Whatever he may say to you -- do.' And there were there six water-jugs of stone, placed according to the purifying[9] of the Jews, holding each two or three measures[10]. Jesus saith to them, 'Fill the water-jugs with water;' and they filled them -- unto the brim; and he saith to them, 'Draw[11] out, now[12], and bear to the director of the apartment[13];' and they bare. And as the director of the apartment tasted the water become wine, and knew not whence it is, (but the ministrants knew, who have drawn the water,) the director of the feast doth call the bridegroom, and saith to him, 'Every man, at first, the good wine doth set forth; and when they may have drunk freely, then the inferior; thou didst keep the good wine till now.' This beginning of the signs[14] did Jesus in Cana of Galilee, and manifested his glory, and his disciples believed in him (John 2:1-11, cf. John 2:1-11, NLT—the “dear” at John 2:4, NLT, is maybe a little overly non-literal: “…TI EMOI KAI SOI GUNAI…”).

 

COMMENTARY: Who, what, when, and where concern us at the outset of this commentary. Who: Jesus, the disciples, the mother of Jesus, a bride and a bridegroom. What: A marriage feast. When: A Monday. Where: Cana of Galilee: “…And the third day a marriage happened in Cana of Galilee, and the mother of Jesus was there, and also Jesus was called, and his disciples, to the marriage…”. Possibly bride and bridegroom were somehow related to Jesus. Conspicuously missing, not mentioned, is Joseph. Given his absence in the further ministry of Jesus it is possible that he had passed away before this the beginning of Jesus’ ministry.

 

A marriage feast. Marriage. Feast. Aren’t those lovely words? How exceedingly appropriate for Jesus to begin His ministry therewith. This is no accident. The point of interest is the blood red wine. A marriage feast is but a formality; wine, gives it life. And the life had failed, deceased: “…and wine having failed, the mother of Jesus saith unto him, 'Wine they have not;'…”. No life. Thus the predicament, this tight spot, is posed to the Way, and the Truth, and the Life (John 14:6), by His mother, who sustained the life of the God-Child for a time with her blood, and delivered Him covered by that same blood. This is the way of life for all—mother, woman, and child, by His design, He taking no exceptions, identifying with the same. The predicament is just posed here; she specifically asks of Him nothing. But still, good for her, she knows the right One to engage in matters concerning Life, though His hour had not yet come to manifestly address this business of Life, itself the mainstay of His ministerial purposes (John 10:10). It is presaged here, this Life—Life per se (Leviticus 17:11), and that of two special Marriage Feasts (John 2:9, Matthew 26:29)—in that blood red wine that had deceased (Genesis 3:19, John 2:3), and come to life again (John 2:9, 14:19). Yes, come to life again per the Way, and the Truth, and the Life, even Jesus Christ.

 

In His response to His mother—this woman, who miraculously bore Him via the Spirit of Jehovah God, and delivered Him, Jesus affirms His ministerial purposes—Life—which presses upon His willing lips a bitter-sweet cup He must drink in due time, when His hour has come (Mark 14:36, 1Corinthians 11:25-26), and yet He folds into His response the concerns of His mother, for suggested is that which He is about to do for her in her immediate predicament, for He gives Life at all scales: “…Jesus saith to her, 'What -- to me and to thee, woman? not yet is mine hour come.'…”. But of course, her hour, not at all like His, and consequent to His, has come. This is left unsaid but demonstrated to her presently. Two “hours,” one for our Lord in due time, for the Life of many, and one for His mother presently, for the life of a few, that nevertheless looks forward to a bigger Feast. We shall take the angle that Jesus’ response is a question that begs a reflective comparison upon two hours—Jesus is a Teacher. In this way, ultimately, He reveals Father God through His many teachings found all over Scripture.

 

Jesus’ mother issues the model response to Jesus’ words—let us embrace her wisdom: “… 'Whatever he may say to you -- do.'…”. Yes, do. These “whatever” things of His to be done we find in His Word today. Not difficult at all to discern these whatever things. Much harder to do oftentimes, but we must give it our best effort and depend on Him to do that which He knows we cannot do. And now the doing in this context: “…Jesus saith to them, 'Fill the water-jugs with water;' and they filled them -- unto the brim…”. There we have it—thus and so is well done when servants fill things to the brim when the Master says “do it,” do thus and so. Let us not cheat God or cozy up to shortcuts. In the same way He fills us, to the brim, with His Spirit (Luke 11:13)—no shortcuts here, no way. Now comes the pivotal moment in these verses; it concerns drawing and bearing. Drawing, and bearing—there is the Christian life in a nutshell if you will. Precisely then is when miracles happen, particularly, Salvation. Drawing on Jehovah God and bearing that which is drawn to whichever “director of the feast” our Lord wishes to bless through our bearing is the stuff of miracles. Bearing per se literally, as in carrying, yea, carrying each other’s burdens (Galatians 6:2), or maybe bearing long, bearing for the Master (Jeremiah 15:15). All good, rich: “…and they bare [so it is spelled here]…”.

 

Those to whom we bear the Word of God and the things of God are oftentimes ignorant of the same: “…And as the director of the apartment tasted the water become wine, and knew not whence it is, (but the ministrants knew, who have drawn the water)…”.This is why God wants us to bear to them of course, so that intimacy might by-and-by follow; a taste of, or perhaps better put, for, the divine. O that those to whom we bear might in fact taste (Psalms 34:8). And notice please that the servants, those who bear, “know.” Exactly what do they know that some others do not? Far greater things than water become wine as in this context, namely, the spirit within become the Spirit of God throughout, this change—a miracle to say the least. Thus are they servants after all.

 

We see by means of testimony how good Jesus’ wine is: “…the director of the feast doth call the bridegroom, and saith to him, 'Every man, at first, the good wine doth set forth; and when they may have drunk freely, then the inferior; thou didst keep the good wine till now.'…”. Moreover, no hoodwinking with Jesus here. In other words, man would have it: put out the good wine and let all drink freely such that the cheaper, inferior wine can be served sort of inconspicuously, unawares, and sooner than later, for the rest of the day or evening, but with Jesus it is all good all the time. If we may lean on the wine-life analogy once more, then we might read too at this point the inferior life up front down here followed by the superior Life that Jesus provides. The mundane reality of this world, and this life, is inferior to the superior reality of Heaven, and life eternal in Jehovah God’s presence (Salvation).  The “wine” will not fail there, literally and figuratively (“A Letter of Invitation”).

 

And finally, we may deduce that Jesus’ ministry was signs-intensive (John 20:30-31): “…This beginning of the signs did Jesus in Cana of Galilee…”.  In this way He identified Himself, very Glory, for He does not expect belief in Himself, and by association Father God (John 17:5), to lack a factual foundation: “…and manifested his glory, and his disciples believed in him…”.

 

2:12-Headquarters Capernaum

YLT TEXT: after this he went down to Capernaum[15], he, and his mother, and his brethren, and his disciples; and there they remained not many days. (John 2:12, cf. John 2:12, NLT).

 

COMMENTARY: From Nazareth, and that misguided expulsion (Luke 4:16ff), Jesus’ Galilean ministry found itself headquartered in Capernaum (possibly suggested by Matthew 4:13, 9:1-“own city”, Luke 4:31-part of the Nazareth expulsion account), a fishing village on the shore of Lake Galilee, roughly 127 kilometers/79 miles from Jerusalem (Fig. 1, background). So our text places the Great One Jesus back at His headquarters after His first great public miracle in Cana. Soon He departs for Jerusalem and the Passover.

 

2:13-25-One Cleansing of the Temple, Three Eye-Witness Accounts

YLT TEXT: And the passover[16] of the Jews[17] was nigh, and Jesus went up to Jerusalem[18], and he found in the temple those selling oxen, and sheep, and doves, and the money-changers[19] sitting, and having made a whip of small cords, he put all forth out of the temple, also the sheep, and the oxen; and of the money-changers he poured out the coins, and the tables he overthrew, and to those selling the doves he said, 'Take these things hence; make not the house[20] of my Father a house of merchandise[21].' And his disciples remembered that it is written, 'The zeal of Thy house did eat me up;' the Jews then answered and said to him, 'What sign dost thou shew to us -- that thou dost these things?' Jesus answered and said to them, 'Destroy this sanctuary[22], and in three days I will raise it up.' The Jews, therefore, said, 'Forty and six years was this sanctuary building, and wilt thou in three days raise it up?' but he spake concerning the sanctuary of his body; when, then, he was raised out of the dead, his disciples remembered that he said this to them, and they believed the Writing, and the word that Jesus said. And as he was in Jerusalem, in the passover, in the feast, many believed in his name, beholding his signs that he was doing; and Jesus himself was not trusting[23] himself to them, because of his knowing[24] all men, and because he had no need that any should testify concerning man, for he himself was knowing what was in man (John 2:13-25, cf. John 2:13-25, NLT).

 

COMMENTARY: We had this before via the synoptic gospels (“Holy Week”). Here we get John’s version—one cleansing, three eye-witnesses to the facts (Matthew, Peter as related to Mark, and John). One of the beauties of the Gospel, particularly, the ministry of Jesus Christ, is its consistency despite the different vantage points of the eye-witnesses to the events each of these inspired authors recorded. Very inspiration necessitated that each record the facts as they were called to record them—not through the lens of their worldviews, no way, but precisely through the lens of the view of the world from Jehovah God’s perspective as related to the given author (John here) by Him. Of course, God did this on purpose, for our edification, unto holiness (Christlikeness). We will discuss John’s version here.

 

John has been led to focus on signs, as we saw in the Cana miracle record. Here, in apt continuity with that, John continues this signs-focus. We get here a new sign, a heads-up sign, as to the impending vexations to Jesus’ Spirit that would attend His soon-to-blossom ministry—the frictions inherent in it, the antagonists standing against it and Him (1Timothy 6:5). Let us remember that His identity was settled in Cana—this was the first sign; makes sense: here is Messiah, very deity in our midst. And this next sign is a ship-righting (local, global) sign that bespeaks of Jesus’ ministerial goals, and it must necessarily be conveyed to the hearer of this gospel next; makes sense too. The reach of these two signs covers everything about Jesus and His ministry, though neither is fully grasped. It is terrific how John gets this angle concerning the next sign; it says a thing or two about his gospel. The thing about it is, what we mean is, he places the cleansing up front in Jesus’ ministry (John’s gospel is not Synoptic-chronological, it is Sign-theological; this is quite deliberate [John 20:30-31]). Jesus’ ministry was certainly Redemption-Salvation (life eternal in Jehovah God’s presence); but, in no small way, He came to set a ship aright (local, global), and the (local) ship that was foundering was scraping the bottom because it thought to play God the fool via its super-added, phony, even oppressive religiosity, and to hold Him hostage to a building, namely, the Temple here in view. God would soon tear that building down stone by stone (Matthew 24:2, ”Matthew Chapter Twenty-Four Commentary”), from the outside-in as it were, and here He passionately rips it apart from the inside-out (Malachi 3:1-5—last canonical book of the Old Testament presaging Jesus Christ the Refiner). Outside-in because of its façade-like religiosity, inside-out because of the perversion of His Name which He was pleased to attach to it, in the way of servicing its spiritual facades at the expense not only of His Name, but at the expense of the much-beloved ones embracing Him inside. Of course, this cleansing is a warning of what is to come. A last warning. There had been plenty of warnings before (going way back before Jesus’ day even), but nobody was listening. This was the last warning, and quite animated, lest anyone miss the sign. God was in flame here, cord in hand John tells us, burning with passion, zeal, for His House (Psalms 69:9): “…and he found in the temple those selling oxen, and sheep, and doves, and the money-changers sitting, and having made a whip of small cords, he put all forth out of the temple, also the sheep, and the oxen; and of the money-changers he poured out the coins, and the tables he overthrew, and to those selling the doves he said, 'Take these things hence; make not the house of my Father a house of merchandise.' And his disciples remembered that it is written, 'The zeal of Thy house did eat me up…”. Zeal for God’s House, which consisted not of endearing, lovely stones and mortar here in Jesus’ thinking, but of flesh and blood (Hebrews 3:5-6). Flesh and blood that was getting duped, and fleeced, and misled, and ripped, under the auspices of His Name, as broadcast by what was humanly being condoned “inside” in His Name, and the Temple stood for all of that. So, Jesus rips it here. And as suggested above, this was only the beginning (Titus leveled the place later). But of course, these same money-grubbing religious frauds that felt the cord of the Refiner would be and were a vexation to our Lord’s Spirit throughout His ministry, and would and in fact did kill Him, like unto His prophets and servants of old, setting into motion the Wheels of Salvation nevertheless, that turn on the Redemption that, ironically, the cord-bloodied Refiner wrought at Calvary. Jesus signals as much a priori: “…' the Jews then answered and said to him, 'What sign dost thou shew to us -- that thou dost these things?' Jesus answered and said to them, 'Destroy this sanctuary [as I know you will is understood; here is prophecy], and in three days I will raise it up.' The Jews, therefore, said, 'Forty and six years was this sanctuary building, and wilt thou in three days raise it up?' but he spake concerning the sanctuary of his body; when, then, he was raised out of the dead [Resurrection], his disciples remembered that he said this to them, and they believed the Writing, and the word that Jesus said…”. The Resurrection fulfills prophecy and is central to believing in Jesus. Without the Resurrection the whole edifice of Christianity topples over and Christian Salvation is but a sham. That in no small part is why Jehovah God gave us primary-source testimonies concerning it. This second sign (the cleansing) is loaded with theological import and is second in import only to the Cana self-disclosure sign of Jehovah God. The reader may deduce these things from whichever gospel they choose to read; in the end the gospels say the same thing because that is the intention of the blessed Author, even the Refiner.

 

It's the heart you (and I) know too well: “…And as he was in Jerusalem, in the passover, in the feast, many believed in his name, beholding his signs that he was doing; and Jesus himself was not trusting himself to them, because of his knowing all men, and because he had no need that any should testify concerning man, for he himself was knowing what was in man…” (Job 15:15-16, Jeremiah 17:9, Matthew 15:17-20).

 

Praised be your Name King of Glory Jesus. Amen.

 

III. Illustrations and Tables

Figure 1. Palestine.

 

Works Cited and References

 

A Letter of Invitation.”

Jesus, Amen.

< http://jesusamen.org/aletterofinvitation.html >

Aorist.”

Wikipedia.

< https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aorist >

Barclay, William.

The Gospel of John Vol. 1.

Louisville KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2001.

Bible Weights and Measures.”

Bible Hub.

< http://biblehub.com/weights-and-measures/ >

Biblical and Talmudic Units of Measurement.”

Wikipedia.

< https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_and_Talmudic_units_of_measurement#Liquid_measure >

Biblical Weights and Measures—Modern Equivalents.”

GotQuestions.org.

< https://www.gotquestions.org/biblical-weights-and-measures.html >

Blue Letter Bible Study Tools.

< http://blueletterbible.org >

Capernaum.”

Wikipedia.

< https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capernaum >

He Who Sent Me.”

Jesus, Amen.

< http://jesusamen.org/hewhosentme.html >

Henry, Matthew.

Commentary on John Chapter Two.

< http://blb.sc/002oia >

“John Chapter One Commentary.”

Jesus, Amen.

< http://jesusamen.org/commentaryjohn1.html >

John Chapter Three Commentary.”

           Jesus, Amen.

           < http://jesusamen.org/commentaryjohn3.html >

“Matthew Chapter Twenty-Four Commentary.”

Jesus, Amen.

< http://jesusamen.org/commentarymat24.html >

 

McGee, J.V.

Commentary on John Chapter Two.

< https://www.blueletterbible.org/audio_video/popPlayer.cfm?id=7643&rel=mcgee_j_vernon/Jhn >

Perfective Aspect.”

Wikipedia.

< https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perfective_aspect >

The Online Greek Bible.

< http://greekbible.com >

Young's Literal Translation.

The YLT is in the public domain.

 

Notes

(words under study are highlighted)


[1] [And] the third day [a marriage happened in Cana of Galilee]. We are interested in the case, which is dative. Possibly, “…and [on] the third day…”, which would put the day of the wedding on a Monday going by Saturday being the first day of the week. There are other possibilities.

[2] [And the third day a] marriage-Strong’s G1062. [happened in Cana of Galilee]. See also, and, and.

[3] [And the third day a marriage happened in] Cana of Galilee, -Strong’s G2580 [and the mother of Jesus was there, and also Jesus] was called, and the disciples]. See also, and.

 

[4] [And also Jesus] was called-Strong’s G2564 [and the disciples]. Verbal usage is aorist (as marking a point in time in the past, here understood to be the day of the marriage; the verbal form has the same stem across all moods; the communicative power of the aorist lies in its communicative abstraction potential, realized as a consequence of it being an aspect | tense verbal form; that is, aspect, as relating the “flow” of the action, which is perfective for the aorist—“wholly” simple [was called here “one and done”—as opposed to, say, a non-aoristic “habitual” imperfective aspect, which is not “wholly” simple, but consists rather of strata of the action], and then it communicates tense as well, as relating the past, present, or future nature of the action—so here we have wholly simple action in past time), passive (subject Jesus focus of the action), indicative (statement of fact, probably “matter-of-factly” here). Bid, invite, in context.

[5] [And the] wine-Strong’s G3631 [having failed]. See also.

[6] [And the wine] having failed-Strong’s G5302. Exhausted, “ran out of it.” Verbal usage is aorist (looking back to a specific point in time of “failure”), active (subject, wine, acting/failing), participle (here a compound verbal form utilized as an adjective describing the state of the wine).

[7] [the mother of Jesus saith unto him, wine they nave not, Jesus saith to her what to me and to thee] woman-Strong’s G1135. “Woman,” as in flesh and blood, in need of Redemption. See also.

[8] [His mother saith to the] ministrants-Strong’s G1249 [whatever he may say to you do]. Servants. See also.

[9] [ And there were six water jugs of stone, placed according to the] purifying-Strong’s G2512 [of the Jews]. See also.

 

[10] [ Six water jugs of stone, placed according to the purifying of the Jews, holding each two or three] measures-Strong’s G3355 [Jesus saith to them, fill the water jugs with water]. See also. Rounding, twenty to thirty gallons each, or one-hundred-twenty to one-hundred-eighty gallons total thereabouts. This is an impressive quantity of water changed to wine. A gracious wedding gift. God is so gracious; praised be His blessed Name.

[11] [and he saith to them] draw out-Strong’s G501 [now]. Verbal usage is aorist (perfective aspect here, which requires that the action be understood as a “simple whole” [please tuck away that word “whole”]), active, imperative (direct address command). Note the imperative—the miracle cannot unfold without the ministrants engaging this imperative aright (not least, now, Jesus says). Okay back to the guidance provided by the “draw out” aorist—the aoristic/perfective aspect utilized (action=simple whole) might indicate that the miracle—lowly water changed into extraordinary wine—was completed precisely upon drawing out the lowly water; we think that the whole body of water underwent this metamorphosis upon being drawn out—probably the instant a given servant dipped into and drew from one of the six water pots it was wholly changed into wine. After all, the master of the ceremony (ARCHITRIKLINOS) knew not whence it came, but the servants did! “…And as the director of the apartment tasted the water become wine, and knew not whence it is, (but the ministrants knew, who have drawn the water)…”. This is terrific. Praised be the gracious Lord of the Marriage Feast Jesus!

[12] [and he saith to them, draw out] now-Strong’s G3568 [and bear to the director of the apartment]. Whatever deity was thinking (praying over) at this time was such that this particular foreknown miracle was now ready to unfold.

[13] [and he saith to them, draw out, now, and bear to the] director of the apartment-Strong’s G755. Master of ceremonies at a dinner/feast. Possibly head waiter/servant per note seven?

[14] [This beginning of] signs-Strong’s G4592 [did Jesus in Cana of Galilee]. We like signs, literally; certainly, it was a miracle—that goes without saying; our rendering it as signs folds in the fact that it was a miracle, and then additionally, as a sign, it precisely identifies Jesus as deity, and that speaks to Jesus’ purpose to identify Himself here at the outset of His ministry thus establishing and communicating His surpassing authority and qualification for the various aspects of His ministry to come. And all this by way of manifesting His innate glory—here He unveils it somewhat thus revealing/identifying Himself. “…and manifested his glory, and his disciples believed in him…”.

[15] [after this he went down to] Capernaum-Strong’s G2584. See also.

[16] [And the] Passover-Strong’s G3957 [of the Jews was nigh]. See also.

[17] [And the Passover of the] Jews-Strong’s G2453 [was nigh]. See also, and also.

[18] [and Jesus went up to] Jerusalem-Strong’s G2414. See also.

[19] [and he found in the temple those selling oxen, and sheep, and doves, and the] money-changers-Strong’s G2773 [sitting]. See also, and, and.

[20] [make not the] house Strong-s G3624] [of my Father a house of merchandise]. See also. Literally, the Temple; nothing more than a physical space. Spiritually, be it in the heart, or some physical space, where people worship Jehovah God, and where He is pleased to meet them in their worship. Worship is the key. The problem here was that this physical space had become a center of commerce, not worship. Much focus was on commerce and traffic, which took center stage.

Suppose dear reader you invited someone to your house for fellowship. And when they came, they brought their smartphone so they could trade the stock market. So, they are trading the market and all the while you are sitting there off on the side. No fellowship. Then, some other guests arrive, and they do the same thing. Everybody is trading the market, and you are off on the side; no fellowship. It is your house everyone was invited to, to have some quality time together, but there is no fellowship, and you are off on the side while everyone is now to the point where they discuss their trades amongst themselves and plan for more. And again, they are doing this in your house. Next, they raid your kitchen because they are getting hungry. They eat your food without inviting you, the host, to the table. They are eating your food, and discussing their money, collaborating and whatnot to make more money, and you are off on the side. No fellowship. Now they move to your living room and rearrange the furniture so that they can sit just so and make their trades. Your goal is fellowship with these guests, their goal is making better, more lucrative trades, which consumes their conversation amongst themselves. You are off on the side, in your own house; no fellowship. Now one of them calls a local electronics store and orders a large screen television set be brought over, to your house, so that the ticker and the flow of the market can be watched more carefully. Your living room is shuffled around to accommodate this larger television. Soon your guests call yet more of their fellow traders over, to your house. They all bring their smartphones. Now your house is brimming with people making trades, discussing the economy, intently watching the market on the television. Nobody is talking to you, because everyone is too preoccupied with their trades, in your house. We could go on here, but we shall stop. The question is, at what point would you tell them to get out, of your house, for having wrecked your lovely house, turning into a marketplace a once lovely home, with never so much as a “…hello friend, how are you today…” to you from any one of your guests?

We think that Jesus was heartbroken over His Father’s treatment here, in His House—which also stood for His Name by the way, now misrepresented, and He Jesus acted on His Father’s behalf when He put that cord into his blessed hand. He is a Son after all; quintessential Son. We have said it elsewhere—snubbing Father God whom Jesus revealed kindles the same kind of holy wrath in our Lord Jesus—let us Kiss the Son and not snub and/or slight Father God in any way, particularly, in our worship of Him, whatever “house” we may be worshiping in, be it the heart or some physical space. Praised be your lovely and blessed Name Father God. Amen.

[21] [make not the house of my Father] a house of] merchandise-Strong’s G1712. Emporium, as in retail outlet, selling this and that and whatnot.

[22] [Jesus said to them, destroy this] sanctuary-Strong’s G3485 [and in three days I will raise it up]. Jesus’ physical body in context. The sanctuary of the incarnate Jesus’ Spirit.

[23] [and Jesus himself] was not trusting-Strong’s G4100 [himself to them].The slang would have it: “…Jesus didn’t buy it…”. He placed no confidence in these people (their belief, but cf. befuddled, Sanhedrin affiliate Nicodemus in the next chapter—there were exceptions, John 3:2—please catch the signs; these were in fact happening and friend and foe alike knew it; from here in John chapter two the Holy Spirit has the perfect segue into the beginning of next chapter and Nicodemus; one can appreciate how naturally this sequence of events is unfolding “John Chapter Three Commentary”). Jesus placed no confidence in humankind per se. False, finicky, phony; selfish, self-serving, signs-oriented; wanting, wishy-washy, weak; thus is the flesh. Not least, He came to fix that untrustworthiness in humankind. Verbal usage is imperfect (ongoing action in past time; specifically, that was Jesus’ stance coming into the ever-present moment), active, indicative. Please notice the highly revealing verbal-tense teamwork of He was not trusting | imperfect tense here + His knowing | present tense in note twenty-four just below—this is a summary-statement of humankind’s ongoing holiness problem that prevents fellowship with God except for the imparted holiness of the Holy One here relating God’s mistrust usward. Without God’s imparted holiness God certainly cannot fellowship with unholy humankind, which fellowship presupposes trust in this and that hands down, and what we see here is that God knows better, has always known better, than to fellowship with unredeemed humankind (if one could think of an infinitely stronger word than prudence it would fit here). Our state is very grievous apart from Jesus Christ. Let us not slip into eternity without Him.

[24] [and Jesus himself was not trusting himself to them, because of his] knowing-Strong’s G1097 [all men]. Intimate familiarity with the nature of the subject (humankind). Verbal usage is present (the instant of the ever ongoing now), active, infinitive (no limits as to person and number=infinite applicability).

 

 

TOP